Add Keystone upstream sync #434
Conversation
Until [1] and [2] are merged, we need to be able to build keystone from downstream source with [1] and [2] applied. [1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/957547 [2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/956549
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Summary of Changes
Hello @seunghun1ee, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request introduces a temporary configuration change to enable building the Keystone project from a downstream source. This is necessary to apply specific unmerged upstream changes, allowing development to proceed with critical updates before their official integration into the main upstream branches. The changes primarily involve updating repository synchronization settings.
Highlights
- Keystone Upstream Configuration: A new configuration entry for 'keystone' has been added to the
source-repositoriesfile. This entry defines how Keystone should be handled for upstream synchronization. - Ignored Releases for Keystone: Specific OpenStack releases (Victoria, Wallaby, Xena, Zed, 2023.1, and 2024.1) have been marked as 'ignored_releases' for the Keystone project within the source repository configuration.
- CODEOWNERS Configuration: The
.github/CODEOWNERSfile has been configured for the Keystone project, ensuring proper ownership and review processes are applied.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
| Feature | Command | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
| Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
| Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
| Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds configuration for the keystone repository to the source-repositories manifest, enabling upstream syncing. This change is well-aligned with the pull request's goal of building Keystone from a downstream source with specific patches. The new configuration block is correctly placed in alphabetical order and adheres to the existing structure and conventions of the file. The list of ignored releases appears to be correct for targeting the intended branches. The change is sound and I have no suggestions for improvement.
Until [1] and [2] are merged, we need to be able to build keystone from downstream source with [1] and [2] applied.
[1] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/957547
[2] https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/keystone/+/956549